A Gentleman’s view.

The dirty game of politics played by gangsters with degrees cloaked in Brooks Brothers proper!

Archive for May, 2011


God Damn You Sarah Palin!

For some folks, Sarah Palin is persona non grata indeed! Posted by 11 Bravo on Democratic Underground .com

For some time now, you have been an amusing, albeit mostly incoherent annoyance. But today you crossed a line. With that high cut helmet, carefully designed to allow your professionally coiffed hair to flow freely, you have tried to hijack a moment that you can’t even begin to understand. You decided that an event that has for years been intended to call attention to our POW/MIAs would make a really cool photo-op, as well as a great kick-off for your next get-rich-quick scheme.
Well, Sarah, you picked my war this time. I had several buddies, two of whom died within a couple of meters of me, and you zoomed right past their names on The Wall today; winking and smiling all the way. You weren’t invited, you weren’t welcome, but when has that ever stopped you?
Did you make a few extra bucks for your PAC? If so, I hope that helps you sleep tonight. Because you see, Sarah, my buddies have been sleeping for 40 years; and if they knew that a two-bit grifter like you would one day be making money off of their sacrifice, they might not be resting as easily as I hope they are tonight.
I’m a Christian, Sarah, and I don’t say this lightly … God damn you, Sarah Palin.

Share

I Like Dallas Mavericks in 7 Myself

Matt Mosley ARCHIVE | EMAIL
Matt Mosley started his career at the Dallas Morning News, where he covered the Dallas Cowboys. He was the first full-time NFL blogger at ESPN.com. Mosley can be heard weekdays as part of Galloway and Co. on ESPN Radio 103.3 FM. Follow Mosley on Twitter: @MattMosley

 

May 27, 2011

DALLAS — The last time someone spotted the Western Conference finals trophy, it was sitting in a training room at American Airlines Center. ESPN’s Doris Burke desperately wanted to visit with Dirk Nowitzki after the Mavs’ closeout win over the Thunder, but he left the postgame ceremony early and quickly removed his Western finals cap. Burke was abandoned by the Mavs’ star players, and she wisely decided against interviewing the inactives.

Nowitzki has dreamed about a chance of redemption ever since his team’s epic collapse against the Miami Heat in ’06. And in the most delicious and soon-to-be-overtold story of the NBA Finals, the Mavs will face the same organization — albeit with a lot of new faces. Here are three reasons the Dallas Mavericks will win this series over the Miami Heat:

1. The Mavs have the best closer in the NBA on their roster.

Some players start their downward spiral at age 32, but Nowitzki has taken his game to another level. Charles Barkley has called him “unguardable,” and that will hold up in this series. Oklahoma City’s Nick Collison did a nice job on Nowitzki for much of the Western finals, but the Mavs forward still threw down 48- and 40-point games. Udonis Haslem has given the Heat a boost, but it’s not like he can hold up for long stretches against Nowitzki. Dallas native Chris Bosh will get his chances on Nowitzki, but he’s not physical enough to keep him from driving for buckets. Ask the talented young Serge Ibaka about that spin move that Nowitzki breaks out every other game.

Dwyane Wade already has a ring, and LeBron James still has the bulk of his career in front of him. Nowitzki knows this could be his last opportunity at a title, and you can tell it in his overall approach. He has stayed in attack mode throughout the playoffs, and that’s not going to change.

“Once you get to the Finals, there is no second-place finish,” Nowitzki said Wednesday. “We got one of those (conference) trophies already, and it didn’t mean anything at the end.”

2. Jason Kidd has been dominant in the playoffs.

Kidd was able to sit out the final week of the regular season, and the rest helped him immensely. He’ll be the smartest player on the court for either team, and he’ll be able to control the tempo. This is the most unselfish team in the NBA, and Kidd’s the main reason for that. He’ll always make the extra pass, but he’s also lethal from the 3-point line. If you wonder why the Mavs outscored the Thunder 34-8 in the final five minutes of the last two games, don’t just look at Nowitzki. Coach Rick Carlisle doesn’t have to call a single play because Kidd knows exactly what he wants.

And don’t be surprised to see Kidd on LeBron James in the closing minutes of each game. He defended both Russell Westbrook and Kevin Durant, and gave them fits. He’s certainly not as quick as James, but he makes up for it by knowing how to position his body. Kidd was a monster in the Lakers series, and then he completely outplayed the 22-year-old Westbrook. The Heat pulled off its best Mavs imitation with Thursday’s comeback against the Bulls, but I still give the Mavs the advantage in close games because of Kidd.

3. Coaching

A national radio voice who shall remain nameless tried to say Friday that the coaching matchup between Rick Carlisle and Erik Spoelstra was a draw.

Nothing against Spoelstra, but that seems ludicrous to me. Carlisle is a perfect fit for the Mavs. He has persuaded former NBA All-Star Shawn Marion to accept being a role player for the Mavs. It was difficult for Marion to accept at first, but he’s put his pride aside and become Carlisle’s best on-ball defender. And he can still live up to his “Matrix” nickname at times, as evidenced by his 26 points in Game 5 against the Thunder.

No one believed Carlisle when he said Nowitzki didn’t need a “Robin” for the Mavs to win in the playoffs. Carlisle insisted that several players would need to score, and that’s exactly what has happened. Reserve guard J.J. Barea has become a household name nationally based on how he carved up the Lakers. And veteran Peja Stojakovic is still capable of knocking down 3-pointers. Jason “Jet” Terry has put his playoff failures in the past during this current run. And he’s even playing a little defense.

The Mavs have the most unselfish superstar in the league, and his teammates take their cues from him. While LeBron James was trying to assemble a superpower, Nowitzki put his future in the hands of an organization defined, in some ways, by what happened in ’06. The Heat certainly have the most stars, but the Mavs have more intangibles.

Give me the Mavs in 7.

Tags: Dallas Mavericks, nba, Dirk Nowitzki
Share

R.I.P. Gil Scott Heron

 

The revolution will no be televised

 

You will not be able to stay home, brother.
You will not be able to plug in, turn on and cop out.
You will not be able to lose yourself on skag and skip,
Skip out for beer during commercials,
Because the revolution will not be televised.

The revolution will not be televised.
The revolution will not be brought to you by Xerox
In 4 parts without commercial interruptions.
The revolution will not show you pictures of Nixon
blowing a bugle and leading a charge by John
Mitchell, General Abrams and Spiro Agnew to eat
hog maws confiscated from a Harlem sanctuary.

The revolution will not be televised.
The revolution will not be brought to you by the
Schaefer Award Theatre and will not star Natalie
Woods and Steve McQueen or Bullwinkle and Julia.
The revolution will not give your mouth sex appeal.
The revolution will not get rid of the nubs.
The revolution will not make you look five pounds
thinner, because the revolution will not be televised, Brother.

There will be no pictures of you and Willie May
pushing that shopping cart down the block on the dead run,
or trying to slide that color television into a stolen ambulance.
NBC will not be able predict the winner at 8:32
or report from 29 districts.
The revolution will not be televised.

There will be no pictures of pigs shooting down
brothers in the instant replay.
There will be no pictures of pigs shooting down
brothers in the instant replay.
There will be no pictures of Whitney Young being
run out of Harlem on a rail with a brand new process.
There will be no slow motion or still life of Roy
Wilkens strolling through Watts in a Red, Black and
Green liberation jumpsuit that he had been saving
For just the proper occasion.

Green Acres, The Beverly Hillbillies, and Hooterville
Junction will no longer be so damned relevant, and
women will not care if Dick finally gets down with
Jane on Search for Tomorrow because Black people
will be in the street looking for a brighter day.
The revolution will not be televised.

There will be no highlights on the eleven o’clock
news and no pictures of hairy armed women
liberationists and Jackie Onassis blowing her nose.
The theme song will not be written by Jim Webb,
Francis Scott Key, nor sung by Glen Campbell, Tom
Jones, Johnny Cash, Englebert Humperdink, or the Rare Earth.
The revolution will not be televised.

The revolution will not be right back
after a message about a white tornado, white lightning, or white people.
You will not have to worry about a dove in your
bedroom, a tiger in your tank, or the giant in your toilet bowl.
The revolution will not go better with Coke.
The revolution will not fight the germs that may cause bad breath.
The revolution will put you in the driver’s seat.

The revolution will not be televised, will not be televised,
will not be televised, will not be televised.
The revolution will be no re-run brothers;
The revolution will be live.

Share

Veteran

Share

GOP Challenges Can Be Hazardous To Your Health

 

JANE ROH

6:48 AM, May. 23, 2011|

A Cherry Hill High School East sophomore
who challenged Tea Party champion
Michele Bachmann to a constitutional
debate says she is concerned for her
personal safety.

“A lot of them are calling me a whore,” 16- year-old Amy Myers said, referring to anonymous comments reacting to online news reports about her challenge to the
55-year-old Minnesota congresswoman.

 

In a letter addressed to Bachmann and dated April 29, Myers leveled pointed criticisms at the Tea Party Caucus founder.

“I have found quite a few of your statements regarding the Constitution of the United States, the quality of public school education and general U.S. civics
matters to be factually incorrect, inaccurately applied or grossly distorted,” Myers wrote.

“As one of a handful of women in Congress, you hold a distinct privilege and responsibility to better represent your gender nationally. The statements you
make help to serve an injustice to not only the position of Congresswoman, but women everywhere.”

Myers and her father, Wayne, posted her letter to Bachmann on CNN’s iReport website on May 6. News outlets including Yahoo and The Atlantic picked up the story
over the weekend.

Amy and Wayne Myers said the comments on conservative websites alarmed them most. Several commenters threatened to publish the Myers’ home address.

Others threatened violence, including rape, they said. “They’re targeting me just because I’m challenging Bachmann,” Amy said.

 

Amy’s challenge is arguably unrealistic: Few if any sitting members of Congress would
actually agree to debate a teenager. Bachmann, talked up by the Republican right wing as a 2012 presidential contender, is often the subject of
unflattering press. An aide said Tuesday the office would have no response to Myers’ challenge.

The Courier-Post had scheduled a video interview with Amy Thursday. On Wednesday, a somewhat panicked-sounding Wayne Myers phoned to cancel,
citing the alleged threats. “I got a call from the principal that the main office received threatening mail,” said thecomputer programmer and single father.

Myers also said he did not want Amy on video because he believes it would benefit Bachmann.

“We just don’t want her going over any of the positions she’s going to have,” he said. “We’re going to keep things under wraps until the debate occurs.

“If she does the video interview, they might find certain weaknesses. We don’t want to ring up what her debate strategy is going to be.”

Asked how it was possible he did not anticipate a public backlash from Bachmann’s many fans, Wayne Myers said,”I personally did not think there would be a
reaction like actual stalking and the vitriol that’s coming out.” Myers said he asked a neighbor who works for the New Jersey State Police as well as
his mail carrier to be alert for anyone suspicious. The family also suspects a neighbor may be posting negative comments about Amy.

“The school hasn’t received any phone calls of a threatening nature, but has received calls inquiring whether Amy is actually an East student, whether she wrote the letter,
and inquiries of that nature,” said Susan Bastnagel, spokeswoman for Cherry Hill public schools, in response to an emailed query.

Bastnagel said the district’s security director told Wayne Myers none of the calls contained threats. He also assured Myers the district would investigate any threats.

Lt. William Kushina of the Cherry Hill Police Department said most anonymous online threats are harmless.

 

“They’re usually empty threats. Most of the time they’re just words.” Kushina said anonymous posters often feel they have free range to make the most
incendiary claims out of a false belief they can’t be found out. “A lot of times people think they have anonymity on the Internet and that we can’t
trace it back to them, which is wrong,” he said. “We can always trace it back to them.” The great majority of comments, particularly on Yahoo’s website, have
complimented Amy and ridiculed Bachmann. The Minnesota Republican has more than once stumbled over constitutional questions in public.

In 2009, Bachmann said she would refuse to participate fully in the 2010 Census because the U.S. Constitution requires she only provide the number of people who live
in her household. That is wrong. And in several speeches, including one in response to President Barack Obama’s Jan. 25 State of the Union Address, Bachmann
repeated the patently false claim that the Founding Fathers “worked tirelessly” to abolish slavery. Politicians get facts wrong all the time, of course. William Haney,

founder of the West Jersey Tea Party, said it was premature to associate those making anonymous threats against Myers with the Tea Party or Bachmann.

“I certainly would be interested in seeing those threats rather than taking the word of a parent,” he said. “I find it exceedingly difficult to believe that
anybody who is associated with Michele Bachmann would be threatening Amy.” Amy, who is running for sophomore class president, denied she called out Bachmann
just for publicity. “I wanted her to accept the challenge,” the aspiring veterinarian said. “I just wanted her to see what she’s doing is wrong and it hurts the way women look.”

After some prodding, Amy conceded she did not actually believe Bachmann would agree to a debate. “I was just trying to prove that when a 16- year-old notices somebody

in Congress is doing something wrong, she should reflect on what she is doing and try to fix those errors.”

Reach Jane Roh at (856) 486-2919 or
jroh@gannett.com

Share

If Not One Thing, Then How The Other?

I’m Just Saying!

 

Share

As Humans, We Say Some Of The Ugliest Things

From Change.org:
A week ago, the magazine Psychology Today published an article titled “Why Are Black Women Less Physically Attractive Than Other Women?” on its website. Within hours, following widespread outrage and criticism, the post disappeared.
(It can be still be read here http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3412493 )
Colleagues and peers of Satoshi Kanazawa, the article’s author, have since analyzed his same data and unanimously (and unsurprisingly) found his conclusions in error.
Yet Psychology Today has remained silent. They have refused to apologize or even explain why they published the article.

Articles like Kanazawa’s are more than offensive or spurious—they’re deeply harmful because they promote racist and sexist stereotypes as science.
That’s why documentary filmmaker Aishah Simmons and academic Alisa Bierria are leading a petition on Change.org to call on Psychology Today to apologize and take transparent steps to prevent the publication of racist and sexist material in the future. Click here http://www.change.org/petitions/psychology-today-stop-publishing-racist-sexist-articles  to sign Aishah and Alisa’s petition.

Kanazawa’s article never would have survived a thorough and responsible editorial process. In fact, the author himself doesn’t stand up to review.
Kanazawa has a history of pushing discredited research and is particularly notorious for making meritless claims about race and gender. (He is also known as the mind behind the much-mocked book Why Beautiful People Have More Daughters.)
In an attempt to defend previous publications, Kanazawa wrote, “If what I say is wrong (because it is illogical or lacks credible scientific evidence), then it is my problem. If what I say offends you, it is your problem.”
Well, as Khadijah Britton of Scientific American put it, “Satoshi Kanazawa has a problem.” So does Psychology Today.
Prominent women’s rights advocates, including Gloria Steinem and Beverly Guy Sheftall, former President of the National Women’s Studies Association, have already declared their support for the campaign.
Please click here to add your name to theirs:

http://www.change.org/petitions/psychology-today-stop-publishing-racist-sexist-articles

Thanks for taking action,
Shelby and the Change.org team

 
Psychology Today” posted:
Why Are Black Women Less Physically Attractive Than Other Women?Why black women, but not black men?
Published on May 15, 2011 by Satoshi Kanazawa in The Scientific Fundamentalist

There are marked race differences in physical attractiveness among women, but not among men. Why?

Add Health measures the physical attractiveness of its respondents both objectively and subjectively. At the end of each interview, the interviewer rates the physical attractiveness of the respondent objectively on the following five-point scale: 1 = very unattractive, 2 = unattractive, 3 = about average, 4 = attractive, 5 = very attractive. The physical attractiveness of each Add Health respondent is measured three times by three different interviewers over seven years.

From these three scores, I can compute the latent “physical attractiveness factor” by a statistical procedure called factor analysis. Factor analysis has the added advantage of eliminating all random measurement errors that are inherent in any scientific measurement. The latent physical attractiveness factor has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1.

Recall that women on average are more physically attractive than men. So women of all races are on average more physically attractive than the “average” Add Health respondent, except for black women. As the following graph shows, black women are statistically no different from the “average” Add Health respondent, and far less attractive than white, Asian, and Native American women.

In contrast, races do not differ in physical attractiveness among men, as the following graph shows. Men of all races are more or less equally less physically attractive than the “average” Add Health respondent.

This sex difference in the race differences in physical attractiveness – where physical attractiveness varies significantly by race among women, but not among men – is replicated at each Add Health wave (except that the race differences among men are statistically significant, albeit substantively very small, in Wave III). In each wave, black women are significantly less physically attractive than women of other races.

It is very interesting to note that, even though black women are objectively less physically attractive than other women, black women (and men) subjectively consider themselves to be far more physically attractive than others. In Wave III, Add Health asks its respondents to rate their own physical attractiveness subjectively on the following four-point scale: 1 = not at all, 2 = slightly, 3 = moderately, 4 = very. As you can see in the following graphs, both black women and black men rate themselves to be far more physically attractive than individuals of other races.

What accounts for the markedly lower average level of physical attractiveness among black women? Black women are on average much heavier than nonblack women. The mean body-mass index (BMI) at Wave III is 28.5 among black women and 26.1 among nonblack women. (Black and nonblack men do not differ in BMI: 27.0 vs. 26.9.) However, this is not the reason black women are less physically attractive than nonblack women. Black women have lower average level of physical attractiveness net of BMI. Nor can the race difference in intelligence (and the positive association between intelligence and physical attractiveness) account for the race difference in physical attractiveness among women. Black women are still less physically attractive than nonblack women net of BMI and intelligence. Net of intelligence, black men are significantly more physically attractive than nonblack men.

There are many biological and genetic differences between the races. However, such race differences usually exist in equal measure for both men and women. For example, because they have existed much longer in human evolutionary history, Africans have more mutations in their genomes than other races. And the mutation loads significantly decrease physical attractiveness (because physical attractiveness is a measure of genetic and developmental health). But since both black women and black men have higher mutation loads, it cannot explain why only black women are less physically attractive, while black men are, if anything, more attractive.

The only thing I can think of that might potentially explain the lower average level of physical attractiveness among black women is testosterone. Africans on average have higher levels of testosterone than other races, and testosterone, being an androgen (male hormone), affects the physical attractiveness of men and women differently. Men with higher levels of testosterone have more masculine features and are therefore more physically attractive. In contrast, women with higher levels of testosterone also have more masculine features and are therefore less physically attractive. The race differences in the level of testosterone can therefore potentially explain why black women are less physically attractive than women of other races, while (net of intelligence) black men are more physically attractive than men of other races.

Mr. Kanazawa has made a career out of explaining why Asians are biologically smarter, African-Americans are biologically inferior, and why nuking the middle east is a good idea. Rather than being confined to Stormfront, however, he’s given an article in Psychology Today.

Share

Maybe We All Do Better When We All Do Better?

A Democrat wins in the middle of a Rethugliklan stronghold in Western New York Upstate election.

 

 

Paul Ryan’s plan to punish the middle- and working-class is dead. And we say without reservation that the leaders, members, supporters and staff of the WFP are proud to have played a role in its demise.

For weeks, we’ve been talking about how the stakes were high and getting higher in the special congressional election in Western New York. We’ve been asking – make that pleading – for support, and a combination of WFP and MoveOn members dug deep and made it possible for us to really get to work.

Last night, the D-WFP candidate, Kathy Hochul, has been declared the winner in this most important race. In a most improbable, overly Republican district. A few weeks ago none of the pundits thought she had a chance.

But we had a great candidate, and it didn’t take long for this to turn into a “referendum on the Ryan plan to destroy Medicare.”  The Republican-Conservative candidate spent more than $2 million of her own family fortune, and Karl Rove tried to rescue her with a late infusion of still another $1 million in TV commercials. He too knew the stakes were high.

The people were not fooled. Hochul got nearly 50% of the vote in a 4-way race, beating all expectations – including ours.

Middle-class and working-class citizens of Western New York, seniors and younger people alike, cast a vote for a better America today. In the words of the late Senator Paul Wellstone, the voters of the 26th CD were basically saying that “we all do better when we all do better.”

They were not willing to buy the Ryan-Boehner-Pawlenty-Romney-Whoever view that we don’t actually have any obligations to one another, that we are just islands unto ourselves. Medicare is a promise, from one generation to the next, that all Americans deserve to be treated with dignity.  Nothing more, but nothing less either.

The people of Western New York just did a huge solid for the whole country. Now the Democrats need to use this victory well, and stand up for what we know is right. People want straight talk. If we knock on their doors – and we knocked on tens of thousands of them in the last two weeks alone – and if we talk to them workplace by workplace and senior center by college campus….well, we know what can happen.

Enough self-congratulation. This race was important, but it’s by no means the end of our federal work. From now until November 2012, we will make sure that all of New York’s representatives in Washington stay accountable to you and your family and to the idea that we “IN THIS TOGETHER.”


Thanks again for your important role in building our party and keeping us strong, so that we can share these moments of victory together.

In solidarity,

Dan Cantor
WFP Executive Director

p.s. If you’re curious, and we sure hope you are, it looks like Hochul won by a little over 6%. The WFP line represents a little over %5 of the vote. Final returns in a few weeks!

Share
A Gentleman’s view.0.895 Return to Top ▲Return to Top ▲ Copy Protected by Tech Tips's CopyProtect Wordpress Blogs.